Tag Archives: maga

MAGA’s Mirror Politics

The political right wing screamed ‘cancel culture’ in reaction to any attempt to correct their lies and disinformation. 

Yet, who is doing most of the cancelling?

The very same people, with the loudest and most powerful voices who are part of Trump’s MAGA movement and his administration.

It appears at every level, from the petty to the lethal …

Trump responding to a reasonable question from a journalist by accusing her of being a nasty woman is revealing his nasty character but projects it on to someone who dares call him out. 

Trump claimed that an election was stolen and then gets caught out trying to convince an official to “find” some more votes. His administration’s SAVE Act would disenfranchise millions, yet he continues to blame democrats for undermining fair elections.

He doesn’t want to accept the implications of what climate science has established over 200 years of emerging forensic analysis, so what to do? Easy, just defund it or close it down. Then claim they are producing fake science and justify his actions on the basis of disinformation.

Claim that a protestor who was shot dead by ICE was a terrorist, when it is these masked MAGA acolytes being sent into American cities who are the ones doing the terrorising

The list goes on.

Don’t confuse this with some kind of political playground tactic – “you’re a liar”, “No, you’re a liar” back and forth. It has far more sinister roots than that.

The Nazi’s claimed without evidence that Jews were planning a terror campaign against the German people, and used this as a pretext for their Kristallnacht terror campaign. A campaign of terror that was on the path that ultimately led to the Holocaust. 

Hutus were encouraged to accuse the Tutsi of planning what the Hutu militias were already planning. It lead, as planned, to the Rwandan Genocide.

There is a term ‘accusation in a mirror’, coined by French social psychologist Mucchielli, in the context of the 1968 protests, which can be applied to this well rehearsed political strategy:

“Mucchielli described accusation in a mirror as imputing to the adversaries the intentions that one has oneself or the action that you are in the process of enacting. Mucchielli explained how the perpetrator who intends to start a war will proclaim his peaceful intentions and accuse the adversary of warmongering; he who uses terror will accuse the adversary of terrorism.”

I had a debate with someone on social media about a phrase that might work better in an Anglophone and particularly American context. We toyed with Mirror Move, Blame Bluff, Project Play, and several others, but in the end settled on Mirror Politics.

Whatever we call it, this is a central plank of the right wing approach to politics, in the US and in the UK, and we need to recognise it for what it is and call it out, because while it may seem an exaggeration to use examples from Germany and Rwanda, there is a warning from history that over time the accusations and therefore the mirrored intentions can escalate.

This is part of a broader range of malign tactics and strategies that has been termed Dangerous Speech. As Susan Benesch (Executive Director of the Dangerous Speech Project) writes:

“This is a time of fear in the world, and fear is an opportunity for autocrats who use it to consolidate power by using dangerous speech. At the same time, large numbers of people are mobilizing against weaponized fear and violence. We can support them, since the best way to make dangerous speech less powerful is to teach people about it. We are here for that.”

With the mid-terms approaching, American democracy at least is now clearly in the firing line.

When Trump, Vance or any of his MAGA entourage make accusations of bad intentions or plans directed at their opponents – or anyone who exercises their free speech to challenge them – be wary!

The chances are that is exactly what they are doing or planning.

(c) Richard W. Erskine, 2026

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Confronting the hereditarian mindset and embracing diversity

The irony of JD Vance suggesting Britain is in the grip of cultural decline then holidaying in the Cotswolds was not lost on the natives who protested his presence, or the staff who refused to serve him at an up-market pub. Given the state of the USA at present, with its rapidly receding soft power, one might suggest he looks closer to home for cultural collapse.

It seems that, much to the surprise of the ill-educated VP, the Cotswolds is not an England of Mary Poppins and country cottages, frozen in aspic. In fact, the Brits have never been like that, except for gullible tourists. Behind a facade of tranquility, we’ve always been a pretty feisty lot when we need to be. 

We also have a history of absorbing diversity. Just study the archaeology of the London, that Rome founded, or the tens of thousands of Huguenots who fled to Britain. They were not just sheltered here, but played a significant role in our commercial and cultural development. The diversity we find in London’s cuisine today is just another indicator. Trump’s relentless attacks on London’s Mayor rails at this diversity success story with barely concealed racism.

There is now a racially motivated right wing MAGA movement in the USA. This is an old story, and it never ends well.

It is no different in essence to every other racially motivated project that sought ill-conceived racial ‘purity’ over diversity. The list is a long one, and in no particular order: genocide in the Balkans; Apartheid in South Africa; Hindutva in India; the Holocaust/Shoah in Nazi Germany; and the ethnic cleansing perpetuated across the empires of Britain and other European powers.

Interestingly, exploitation of indigenous land and peoples, with its attendant extractivism and racism, has often been linked to climate change and continues to be so [1]. 

Eugenics was so popular in Britain that both the left and right promoted it. Francis Galton was not alone. As Adam Rutherford documents in his book Control: The Dark History and Troubling Present of Eugenics, many of our best known cultural figures were supporters. It was establishment thinking for the likes of H G Wells, Winston Churchill, George Bernard Shaw, Marie  Stopes, and more. 

They based their erroneous beliefs in part on a simplistic hereditarian mindset, which is perpetuated in how we’ve been taught eye colour genetics in school [2]. Some Eugenicists proposed genocide while others proposed ‘humane’ sterilisation. We are ignorant of this history because we choose not to face it.

The need for identity is a strong pull factor in all of us, so erroneous genetic beliefs persist in apparently benign forms, turbocharged by those DNA services that might tell you that you are 10% nordic. “Phew, I made it”, I hear some poor MAGA convert announce. 

All nonsense, but almost everyone plays the game “your paintings are really good but then there have always been great artists in the family”, I am told. Nope! I had an interest in art and worked very hard to develop my practice; no freebies [3].

The desire for identity can so easily turn toxic, and it seems the US Administration under Donald Trump now equates diversity with cultural collapse. 

David McWilliams shows in his book Money: A Story of Humanity, that diversity is always the route to greater prosperity. He gives many examples but the rich diversity of Norman Sicily is perhaps the most impressive of all.

We can learn much from nature in this regard, because nature abhors monocultures. It withers amongst the neatly trimmed lawns and acres of hard standing in America’s suburbia, where nature is curated almost to extinction.

Nature flourishes in messy diversity, as in a coral reef. Human societies and cultures do too.

Photo by Shaun Low on Unsplash

So, let’s end our simplistic hereditarian mindset for good, and embrace the diversity that always has, and always will, enrich our lives culturally, commercially and in our communities.

© Richard W. Erskine, 2026

Notes

  1. The European colonisation of the Americas killed so many by 1600 (about 56 million indigenous people) that forests grew back where their crops once grew (lowering the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere) that then cooled the Earth. Our contemporary extraction and subsequent burning of 300 million year old fossil fuels is not only warming the planet by putting ancient carbon into the atmosphere, but severely polluting indigenous lands: the water resources in North America polluted due to tar sands mining; the decades long impact of Shell’s oil extraction on the Niger delta; the environmental catastrophe created by the monumental Deepwater Horizon oil discharge; this list goes on. Amitav Ghosh’s The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis gives a visceral historical account of the connections between empire, racism, extractivism and climate change.
  1. Gene expression is more complex than the simple Mendelian theory of dominant and recessive genes. For eye colour there’s a gene for colour, but also, a gene that controls the extent of expression of the colour gene. So in practice we get a spectrum of eye colour that includes hazel, for example. While brown is dominant (i.e. the simple rule is that it trumps blue in a partner), in fact two brown eyed parents can sometimes have a blue-eyed child. 
  1. I’m a decent painter mainly because of hard work. I’ve always loved art and science, but at school I was forced to choose, and I chose science. My wife and I visited many exhibitions over the years, but always as onlookers. Only in retirement did I find the time to really focus on developing my art. It’s taken 10 years since then to really master it. I reaped the rewards of hard work and great mentors, not some easy “it’s in your genes” freebie. Even accepting that ‘nature’ and ‘nurture’ each play a role, we put far too much weight on ‘nature’ in many cases.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized